No. 19-8693
Nathan Thomas Trujillo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court-procedure judicial-discretion kimbrough-v-united-states kimbrough-variance policy-grounds sentencing sentencing-guidelines variance
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in sentencing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THE | DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WITH ITS SENTENCE? B. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED A VARIANCE REQUEST FROM THE GUIDELINES ON POLICY GROUNDS PURSUANT TO KIMBROUGH y, | UNITED STATES, 552 U.S. 85 (2007)? | | i |
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Nathan Trujillo
Evangelo Arvanetes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
Evangelo Arvanetes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent