Whether the lower court erred in its application of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |, Coon back Cork Delong ose Aad celakian wy wo ogee teskivey Yo Cons Wh Ani, , Neeck Coe OFker “DigQude ck NOt Bere, Onidien Doan? H4.5E) “asboom Prserdogs ack murda Dada mand Veredons Dee Yo ‘ia . Comst\ eats) Yo oneck On Specie cron, wr Qader eve? taro$.sill “nsuctiaialk evidence, OF Domestic als Teselliny Ww on Berle’, WROA Preiosly, Ne Aven . Wu aeeliced Rocky Cose Sos (nskRan iV Yo Cose CR Mossel Vatele IK Ce Tb LG, ) oo 4. Con Cauc's lppoe lel aes | Gonad Pakives Aue. Yo We ae WoW", “\ \eces\ Hans catthont \ wedge A watt WER OF er Usanten|ey