1. Does the Sixth Circuit's Amended Order, in which it denied Stone's COA Motion; conflict with Lozada v.Deeds, 498 U.S. 430 (199r)(per curiam) and progeny; when case laws establish that Stone's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is debatable among jurists of reason?

2. Is an entrapment defense viable as "the Seventh and D.C. Circuits held, when a police informant persistently induces' a defendant with a drug trafficking record to engage in a fake cocaine transaction after the defendant expressed his reluctance to.do so; or does a drug trafficking record along with some unrelated drug trafficking charges outweigh an informant's improper:inducements and a defendant's reluctance as the Sixth Circuit held?

whether-the-sixth-circuit's-amended-order-conflicts-with-lozada-v-deeds