whether-the-sixth-circuit's-amended-order-conflicts-with-lozada-v-deeds

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . : t i. Boés the Sixth Circuit's Amended Order, in which it ; . denied Stone's COA Motion; conflict with Lozada v.Deeds, 498 . pe U.S, 430 (1991)(per curiam) and progeny, when case laws , ‘establish that Stone's ineffective assistance of counsel . i so claim is debatable among jurists of reason? , : i : 2. Is an entrapment defensé viable asthe Seventh and / _ D.C. Circuits held, when a police informant persistently o " induces’a defendant with a drug. trafficking record to engage . : in a fake cocaine ‘transaction after the defendant expressed : 7 : his reluctance. to.do 30} or does a drug trafficking record : _ along with some unrelated drug trafficking charges outweigh ; an-informant's improper :inducements and, a defendant's . reluctance as the Sixth Circuit held? ° i a ‘ . . ; . : . . an n _ ‘ . ers ; Pee) wt, ae % _ 2. ‘ = _ : : “ :