No. 19-8704
Rolando Q. Alvarado v. Connie Horton, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 appellate-review circuit-court due-process evidentiary-hearing factual-determination habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-error statutory-interpretation unreasonable-determination-of-facts
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is based on an unreasonable determination of the facts due to an incomplete record and is contrary to this Court's precedent on 28 U.S.C.S. §2254(d)(2)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IS THE DECISION OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS BASED ON AN UNREASONABLE DETERMINATION OF THE FACTS INASMUCH AS IT IS BASED ON AN INCOMPLETE RECORD, THROUGH NO FAULT OF THE PETITIONER AND IS SUCH OPINION CONTRARY TO THIS COURT’S PRECEDENT ON 28 U.S.C.S. §2254(d)(2). vi
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent Connie Horton, Warden to respond filed.
2020-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Connie Horton, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent