No. 19-8711
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review jury-trial jury-unanimity sixth-amendment state-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether petitioner’s conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? Whether this Court should grant the petitions, vacate the decision below and remand to the state courts for consideration of the constitutional issue in the first instance? i
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-01-29
Notice of substitution of counsel received.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-05
Reply of petitioner Willie Dunn filed.
2020-11-02
Brief of respondent State of Louisiana in opposition filed.
2020-08-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 2, 2020.
2020-08-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 2, 2020 to November 2, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-03
Response Requested. (Due September 2, 2020)
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
2020-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2020)
Attorneys
State of Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Willie Dunn