No. 19-8719
Brown Laster, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-conflict circuit-split court-of-appeals criminal-procedure harmless-error judicial-precedent kotteakos-standard kotteakos-v-united-states sentencing uniformity
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-eleventh-circuit-entered-a-decision-that-conflicts-with-this-court's-precedent
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit entered a decision that conflicts with this Court's precedent in Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) and consequentially, solidified the existence of a conflict between other United States court of appeals on the same important matter? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Brown Laster, Jr.
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Petitioner
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent