No. 19-8724

Michael Garry v. Trane Company

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2020-06-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure court-procedure evidence-review federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-discretion judicial-procedures mandate-rules mootness newly-discovered-evidence procedural-error structural-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-wisconsin-supreme-court-contravened-appellate-procedure

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented (1) The Wisconsin Supreme Court was manifestly wrong in rejecting the Petitioner's . ~ Appeal for Review, when it failed to consider mitigating, newly discovered ; evidence. . . Such error was structural, instead of issuing a mandate immediately as required , . under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 41(d) (1) (2), it clearly contravened applicable rules of Appellate Procedure, when it dismissed the appeal as moot. Should this Court issue a Writ of Certiorari, when The Wisconsin Supreme Court clearly contravened applicable Rules of Appellate Procedure and unjustifiably departed from ordinary judicial procedures, when extraordinary circumstances . existed. : Should this court order the Wisconsin Supreme Court to issue a mandate to the Wisconsin Labour, Wisconsin Circuit and Appeals Courts to comply with this Court's authority, rules and precedents. me oo, _ Y

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael Garry
Michael Garry — Petitioner
Michael Garry — Petitioner