Did the State of Michigan Supreme Court deny Glenn the equal protection under the state and federal constitution when it rubber-stamped Dr. Glenn's application for leave to appeal due to warrantless accessing of cell phone records pursuant to federal statute?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. DID THe STATE OF MicuiGAN Suptevwe Couer BENY HRss GaLeNN THE EQual PReréacrio UNDER THE STATE ANS Fede@AL Constitution WHEN iT RuBBER= STAYED UR. Glenn's APPLicatton For Leave To APPEAL Due TO WARRANTlesS AccessiNG af Cell PONE Reécokds PURSUANT To FeDeeal Statute CL) WAS Senecel UNDER FEDERAL ConstiruUTION'S FOueTA AMEMUENT 5 And CZ) Violates Foweta Amendment Because SHWING ReQuikeD UNDER Sratute FELL SHORT OF PRoBABE Chuse Re-Quikes FoR WarRrust. THEREBY DENYING (Him A MEANINGFUL Revieo OF His APPEAL Wie THE CASE WAS DEWEN In UN“PRecedenteD Recota TIME « [.