Whether freedom from arbitrary adjudicative procedures is a substantive element of liberty under federal law for non-custodial parents

QUESTION PRESENTED © Family law finds its foundation of rights for Non, Custodial Parents(99 % men) not only under the Family Law Code of California, but the Rules of Court & the Civil Code of Procedure & Case law therein. Likewise, there are restraints upon California law under federal treatises of law like 14° amendment & Equal Justice under the Law. The Rules, Statutes, Case law and procedures call fora : “Payor” having “State” created and recognized rights to receive notice of proceedings, these rights to notice can only be “Forfeited” within specified “Statutory” . conditions. If notice is not received within these “State” created rights to notice & none of the “Specified” “Statutory” conditions for the “Forfeiture” of these rights to notice have been met, then, any resulting orders are “Void”. . As well, the pleadings filed, under the law, “Expire” on the date of the hearing if the procedures for . . . notice are not followed. Thus, leaving the court without Subject Matter Jurisdiction. ; The questions presented is as follows; 1. Under Family Law & the laws of California is Freedom from Arbitrary Adjudicative Procedures a substantive element of one’s Liberty under Federal Law & Protection. 2. When a state creates or recognizes rights & specifies the conditions for their forfeiture, may it thereafter arbitrarily deny such rights for Custodial & " Non-Custodial Parents. 3. “Due process” aka “notice reasonably calculated be accomplished when the actual notice(pleadings) have “Expired” under the law. iti : = PARTIES TOTHEPROCEEDINGS st oe The Petitioner is Maurice Gilbert ne . : The Respondent is Isabel Barrios 7 ae