No. 19-8734
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure district-court genuine-issue jurisdictional-review material-fact material-facts procedural-rule procedural-rules standard-of-review summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA FirstAmendment
Arbitration ERISA FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court deviation from procedural rule while there was overwhelming genuine issue of material fact disputed in the record granting the motion for summary judgment to Defendants?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the district court deviation from procedural rule while there was overwhelming genuine issue of material fact disputed in the record granting the motion for summary judgment to Defendants? : 2. Did the court of appeals err on its jurisdictional duty denied Petitioner’s right as of appeal while the appeal was filed timely? 3. Did the court of appeals lawfully exercise of its prescribed ; jurisdiction affirming a decision below when the standard review has been seriously violated, as a matter of law?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent NY State Office of Mental Health et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-30
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2020)
Attorneys
NY State Office of Mental Health et al.
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent