No. 19-8738
Charles Clark v. Vance Laughlin, Warden
IFP
Tags: competent-jurisdiction constitutional-violation due-process fifth-amendment jury-trial sixth-amendment state-trial-court subject-matter-jurisdiction venue
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Due Process Clause violated where the State court was without subject-matter-jurisdiction to pronounce judgment where the State has failed to prove venue?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LS the Fourteenth AMENOMENT OF the united States Due process clause Viglated where the State trfa) Court Was without Sublect Matter Jurisdiction to pronounce Judgment where the State has fat! to prove VENUE Is the. Sixth Amendment of tho united states Constitution Violated Where the +rial Court is tsithout Competent TJurtsdictton to Pronounce Sudgment Upon w Jury Verdict
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Charles Clark
Charles Clark — Petitioner