No. 19-8740
Anthony J. Williams v. Louisiana
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-trial non-unanimous-verdict sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether petitioner’s conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? Whether this Court should grant the petitions, vacate the decision below and remand to the state courts for consideration of the constitutional issue in the first instance? i
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-13
Brief of respondent State of Louisiana in opposition filed.
2020-09-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2020.
2020-09-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 14, 2020 to November 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-13
Response Requested. (Due September 14, 2020)
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2020-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Anthony Williams
State of Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent