No. 19-8747

Robert Neil Coronado v. Amanda Stinson, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-suppression fourth-amendment judicial-integrity search-and-seizure standing statutory-provisions
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

I.
Was a proceduval vialation due process Committed by the Cout of Appeals in failing to quant Certificate of Appealability or a an Evidentiary Hearing to enleon unadjedicated claims of EvdeNCE of innocence and constitutional Vialations?

II.
Is it sufficient for courts to ignore circumvent, or stipulate,"all issuls have been despositively ruled on," leavrng His claima unanswered d versely affecting His liberty?

III.
Is the integrity of the PRocESS WEAKENEd when courts fail to ackrowledge /

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was a procedural due process violation committed by the Court of Appeals in failing to grant a rehearing on the probability of admission of evidence of misconduct on constitutional issues

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent Amanda Stinson, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
2019-11-19
Application (19A544) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 23, 2020.
2019-11-07
Application (19A544) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 24, 2019 to January 23, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Amanda Stinson, Warden, et al.
Jane Alissa BernsteinNew Mexico Attorney General, Respondent
Robert Neil Coronado
Robert Neil Coronado — Petitioner