Li Qin, et al. v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC, et al.
DueProcess Privacy
Question not identified
Question Presented (1) May a state trial court proceed a personal injury case bypass U.S. Constitution XIV Amendment’s clause of due process and clause of equal protection. On such a trial, all plaintiffs evidences of disability and injuries "were excluded from jury, even they were expelled out the courtroom while a . perjured sub rosa video was demonstrated to jury. Does a trial judge have the privilége to forge out a baseless jury instruction to identify the disable plaintiff , was a heath subject in that video by “The same clothes she wore in the courtroom yesterday” while that blurry video failed to identify its subject. (2) May a defendant’s counsel have the privilege to forge out an antedated [Stipulation] to preclude plaintiffs medical record and evidences from the trial and to play a perjured sub rosa video behind the plaintiff to fool jury to believe that a disable plaintiff was a health lady. And then he concealed and altered or edited that sub rosa video 6 months later. This question is raised per 18 U.S. Code § 1341 Frauds and swindles. ; (3) May a trial judge have a power to deny his own trial record to be included in appeal to obstruct appellate justice? It is the constitutional right to appeal a judgement procured from the frauds and perjuries. This right must include the right to obtain the trial record for appeal. In this case the trial judge indeed denied his trial record to be included in that record of appeal, and then demanded the court of appeal to confirm his judgement as “lack any record . demonstrated any his error.” A defendant’s private recorder substitute the official court reporter to control all oral proceeding on court and conceal those ; transcriptions from appeal against Appellant’s multiple motion to compel. This (1) ? 8 question is defined by California Penal Code Section §135 Conceal of Record and 18 USC Ch. 73: §1506 Obstruction of Justice. Theft or alteration of record or process (4) May a disqualified judge still have the power to issue orders to forbid the real subject in the video to testify the truth, sanction each plaintiff $1,500 in retaliation, and even order to “deny” the report’s transcription to be included the | : appeal. This question is raised per California Code of Civil Procedure §170 and 28 U.S. Code § 455 Disqualification of justice, judge. (5) May a court of appeal dispose an appeal as “no record from which we might concluded the trial court’s judgment is flawed. We will therefore, affirm the trial court’s judgment.” after appellant had timely and properly designated the records and brought 3 motions to augmentation, request and compel those records to be include on appeal. This question is raised per California Ruled of Court CRC. Title 8. Appellate Rules and Federal Rule of Appellate al Procedure Rule 10 The Record on Appeal (6) Shall a state court discriminate and oppressed a disable indigent , plaintiff in pro per victim? All her medical and surgical record even herself in person was expelled of the trial upon defendant’s demanded, because she would disclose defendant’s frauds and perjuries regard to her disability and injuries? This question is raised per California Government Code Section 11135 prohibits discrimination by state and local governments and Americans with Disabilities Act. (1) y/ RS