No. 19-8763
James Delglyn v. Paulino Barros, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof credit-report credit-reporting debt-verification hearsay-evidence judicial-procedure state-statutes wisconsin-law wisconsin-supreme-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it reasonable to demand verification of an alleged debt in the form of a written contract, evidence of a transaction or a sworn statement from a claimant or furnisher on a credit report?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review 1. Is it reasonable to demand verification of an alleged debt in the form of a written contract, evidence of a transaction or a sworn statement from a claimant or furnisher on a credit report? 2. Did the Wisconsin Appeals court err by shifting the burden of proof to the plaintiff? 3. Did the Milwaukee County circuit court err by accepting hearsay as evidence? 4. Do state statutes apply to the Wisconsin Supreme court? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-07
Waiver of right of respondent Pauline Barros, et al. to respond filed.
2020-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Pauline Barros, et al.
Mary Kathryn Curry — Polsinelli PC, Respondent
Mary Kathryn Curry — Polsinelli PC, Respondent