Was the decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio contrary to clearly established federal law and the Supreme Court of the United States precedent of Cole v. Arkansas

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WAS THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CONTRARY TO CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FEDERAL LAW AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PRECEDENT OF Cole v. Arkansas : ae U.S. 196, * 201 ae nae WITHIN THE MEANING OF 28 U.S.C. 22540G)(1) IN OLATION OF PETITIONER’ DUE PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDEMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHEN IT DISMISSED PETITIONER'S CLAIM THAT THE : COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT AFFIRMED HIS CONVICTION ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT TRIAL HAD SHOWN THAT THE VICTIM TESTIFIED TO RAPE BY VAGINAL INTERCOURSE AND THE JURY RETURNED VERDICT FINDING PETITIONER GUILTY OF RAPE BY VAGINAL AN FERCOURSE ON WHICH THE JURY HAD NOT BEEN i.