Timothy W. Hatter v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Whether the court can address the petitioner's habeas petition asking for his APPA rights back when a direct appeal is a fundamental constitutional due process right of every defendant
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4, vow can he courl day datler His Habeas Petition Askin For US Aleck APPA CiGhtS back when A Ditect APM¢AL iS A Fundamental constitutional Bue dross NSM of ewry Aslondant Art 42S AaAinsk woe establishzot Fedemt Lm mal Procedures ? a. How Can the Courk oid that Hotter das not Sun Ang basis +o tol he Stade Shot oF Limitetions oc excuse His untimely Fila unlvse they dust Eailed to (end And of tis Petitions 2 Receuse eer went into Aion Adtm\ oF the ol icles Awl obstadias thot he hed “9 overcome Aust 46 dascauer thet HLS Lawyer Lit ko hit md Ht He Muvays Wot A fisht to A Dilek APRA | 3. How Can +ho Cours Wola Shot tatters counsel was Nok \netdeckwue for Fait to File pw APPA on His Bohs Ac For LommAti ng Legal mateertle wohen 42 Lo erter wohon He told thm Ut 42 Wel vo Panto An APPA Sound MimeS? Roth oF dase Chrams Ad SurPoted by Hho record Cie Sentencing Hearne Arenschiis} vohwe. Yer was Uetlina tout Ue Wanktl An MN Aw YH Cam dlint uuder Filel woth tho Uh Goble Bar Mout dS Bttorneys muss radeantrhan! ee