No. 19-8780
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights court-opinion due-process equal-protection judicial-procedure legal-citation noncitable-opinions procedural-fairness supreme-court-discretion unequal-treatment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Montana Supreme Court err in using an internal operating procedure to invidiously discriminate against the petitioner?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Where the Montana Supreme Court utilized an internal operating procedure to issue noncitable opinions with an evil eye and unequal hand, did the lower court err in invidiously discriminating against Petitioner? . i * QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent Mara Guiffrida to respond filed.
2020-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Mara Guiffrida
Paul A Sandry — Johnson, Berg & Saxby, PLLP, Respondent
Paul A Sandry — Johnson, Berg & Saxby, PLLP, Respondent