No. 19-8788

Travis Job v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: apprendi-rule constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-review prior-conviction prior-criminal-conduct sentencing-enhancement statutory-maximum statutory-minimum
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court should overrule the holding of Almendarez-Torres v. United States

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court should overrule the holding of A/mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which provides an exception to the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), for sentencing provisions that raise a criminal defendant’s otherwise applicable statutory maximum and minimum sentences based on prior criminal conduct? i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States v. Travis Job, United States District Court for the Southern District of California. District court proceeding in which the sentence that is the subject of this petition was imposed on February 21, 2018. Judgment was entered on March 5, 2018. United States v. John Patrick Vescuso, No. 18-50066, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct appeal deciding issue raised in this petition. Judgment was entered on January 9, 2020. ii

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Travis Job
Todd W. BurnsBurns & Cohan, Attorneys at Law, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent