Susana E. Verduzco v. United States
SocialSecurity DueProcess Immigration Privacy Jurisdiction
Whether the U.S. Constitution and federal law(s) grant the Executive Branch the power to intervene in a state's legal action between citizens, override state laws, and grant immunity to federal employees
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Do the U.S. Constitution and federal law(s) grant Mr.’s Donald Trump and William Barr, the absolute power to order, allow or strong-arm a state to solicit, support and illegally endorse the unwarranted federal government intrusion in a state’s legal action between a citizen of a State and a person who is a resident of the same state for a cognizable breach of a “doctor-patient” contract and overt violations of that state’s laws if the U.S. Executive order blurs the lines of federalism, categorically overthrows the state government and is racially driven and not in the interest of the U.S. Judicial integrity, or the People? II. Do the U.S. Constitution and federal law(s) grant Donald Trump and William Barr, the power to grant absolute immunity to a state or federal government employee who, with grave indifference, knowingly, willingly, intentionally, and deliberately: (1) stepped outside the standard of care as an American anesthesiologist; (2) acted in bad faith; (3) breached the express terms of a contract; (4) admitted to the commission of the violent crime of attempted murder and aggravated assault with deadly force, and a deadly instrument against the victim and then bar the victim of this heinous and violent crime from filing a police report and a personal Jaw suit against the federal government employee(s) because Petitioner is a citizen of a foreign state in Mexico? III. Do the U.S. Constitution and federal law(s) grant the U.S. Executive Branch, under the direction of Mr. Trump and Mr. Barr, the power to collude and conspire to obstruct justice with no due process in this case because of Petitioner’s gender and immigration status or are all of the bad actors racist and un-American?