Has the burden of proof been removed in criminal possession cases?

No question identified. : (i) | _ QUE STION(S) PRESENTED HAVE NORTH CAROLINA COURTS REMOVED THE BURDEN OF PROOF ALTOGETHER IN CRIMINAL POSSESSION CASES ? . , V/HAT DECIDES A CRIMINAL CouRT’S TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 8 OBJECTIVE FACTS, OR ALLEGATIONS IN AN INDICTMENT ? “MAY A COURT ORDER A CRIMINAL DEFENDANT TO PAY RESTITUTION "TO : SOMEONE HE WAS NOT CONVICTED OF VICTIMIZING IF THAT SOMEONE NEVERTHELESS CLAIMS VICTIMHOOD STEMMING FROM CRIMES THE DEFENDANT : ACTUALLY WAS CONVICTED OF AGAINST SOME OTHER PERSON ? "IF IT 1S FAR WoRSE TO CONVICT AN INNOCENT MAN THAN To LET A GUILTY MAN GO FREE, WHAT CouLD Move THE SUPREME CouRT TO REVERSE FASTER ‘THAN A STATE KNOWINGLY COMMITTING BOTH OF THESE WRONGS IN A SINGLE case ? DOES THIS CASE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTHORIZING A SECOND FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION ? t: . . (ii) .