Do U.S. courts review pro se filings by a different standard of review than that of a professional attorney, especially in reviewing of evidence and complaint presenting?

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1 Do US. Courts review pro se filings by a different standacd of Review Than that of a professional Attorney, especially in Reviewing of Evidence, and Complaint presenting complaint? © 2If aU-S. Citizen has a ‘Statutory Duty’’ to Report A Crime to U.S. Courts, (Title 18 U.S.C. §04), Does U.S Court have an Invoked, _ Duty to implement corrections, pursuant to (28 U S.C. §453)? 3. A “Criminal Standard of Practice’ Adjudicated by U.S. Court By Those Vested with Authority, Create an Invoked Duty to U $ Courts, especially if criminal standard of practice is foundation to Violate U S. Constitutional Guaranteed Rights of US. Citizens? 4. If AUS Couct is presented with Documents which by theic contents certify perjury, fraud, that were presented to Court to influence judicial proceeding, and now Noticed by opposition of cciminal violations, doesn't This trigger Invoked Duty upon U S Court, pursuant to (28 US C. §453)?