Shane Bruce v. Great Britain, et al.
SocialSecurity Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Are victims of industrial poisoning persecuted as a group with grounds for claims a subclass facing Unconstitutional animus?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Questions of importance to the Public: Are victims of industrial poisoning persecuted as a group with grounds for claims a subclass facing Unconstitutional animus? Is litigation against foreign entities found criminal in harming the populace applicable under JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act)? Does District-wide conspiracy negate medical malpractice pre-trial requirements of ‘goodfaith’ certificates or notification? 7 Is IFP screening or abuses thereof Unconstitutional? Questions of further Consideration: ; Does the District Court have to follow fair and unbiased expected procedures based on precedent of facts and logical argument? Does the District Court have'to maintain its Jurisdiction as a duty? Whether factual error and preserved error is immune from plain error review? Can Orders only cite precedents which conflict with their decisions? Are Pro Per allowed to amend Complaint in perceived errors of form? PARTIES | Shane Bruce is the petitioner; he is the plaintiff-appellant below. . The respondents, defendants-appellee below, are categorized. . The medical malpractice are: Lori P. Staudenmaier M.D., UT Family Physicians, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Gregory A. Finch P.A., . 7 Tennova Cardiology, Stephen Teague M.D., Jeffry Nitz, : Tennova LaFollette Medical Center Clinic, Christian Terzian M.D., Lafollette Medical Center Tennova Healthcare, The failure to warn respondents are: Office of the Secretary of Defense, General James Mattis, ; The Center of Disease Control, oy Sir John Sawers, Chair of the BP geopolitical, environmental safety & aécurity board member of BP plc as of 2015 Britain The poisoning defendant BP ple [British Petroleum] was severed to MDL 2179 2:18-cv02626 United States District Court of Louisiana. Based on evidence! obtained from Respondents the Petitioner withdraws suit against the following parties. Previously joined as the doctors had alleged comparative fault. No longer parties, with thanks for their efforts: “ . : American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) American Medical Association (AMA) is National Institute of Health (NIH) , 1