Randolph Ashford v. Michael Stephan, Warden
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Was the State of South Carolina City of Columbia violate Ashford's 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights by withholding evidence
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : ' Was the State of South Carolina City of Columbia, violate Ashford 4th, Sth, 6th, and 14th Amendment to the United States Constitutional Rights by Withholding evidence. Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to the solicitors closing arguments, by vouching for the credibility of state's witnessess. Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to crime scene contamination of the crime scene evidence presented at trial and admitted into evidence. : . . \ . Wsa trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to the courts jury charge of the weight of the evidence by trial judge. . a Was trial counsel ineffective fo failing to object to the juror : misconduct, stating I've heard all I need to hear during trial Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to inappro: “priate behavior of individuals in the gallery during trial. . Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to quash the illegal, void indictments prior to trial. . i ; ae : ~& ; Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to the jury _ -viewing the video tape prior statement of the victim during deliberation. . : Was trial court in error for refusing to grant a mistrial, due to two separate outbursts made from the state key witness during the trial. EN _'