Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred in denying Mr. Crane's habeas corpus petition

No question identified. : oy aston Presented 02, By swhasst_oudiooriby docs tee MANIIES STATES COWURT ee 03, OF APPEALS. have to conmmyt tye Following WO = Presume that Mn trone Iso SIATUTORY citizen __+_98_born In ood domiciled lo Federal Te ritory (see 8.0s.c. mo) ob Presume tact Mr Crane is NOT o Constrhutlonal Ob. citizen horn tn ond douicled in tne states df tne UnicalSee Wi 10. on "wii status" Known dn odvonced ond tras explaloed tsog {pis dae, oblemetite cause of forte. Ma Crane to eosanaih Bo crime ood violate 18 v.5.C $41) aadfor: Noo 18.6 8999 vy HI lmpes'so okie 9 STATUTORY pr cs00 Tas connglayban wishy of. using i.) _Ie_lows ond stat ures 26 209.c.8285a(c\(a), stokes MeSadial Sat MS. M1394 (2.008) ond Gonzalez. Thaler, Sk US IS HOA A (2019) ASAE VOL ARS IRAIOG ABS IFO ARS. SOARS VBR NARS 13-804 ALES 1B T159) AS13359 ABS NSTOV ARS AB-TOR 20, AWS, 12 BON, ACS. 13198), ABS. 13-1908, ABS, 13-19 ao, os Ble 39 a. for Post Conviction Releif--= is law for Matrope lie to Dd. “hy ational’ ” state nainanal.” ond Conshitucrionol towsh not Stetwbery CO ee a 28g A Ocean Presenbed me ase (c) (2) cand Slack ve Daniel, S29 WS.ATS 48H (2000) ond, sto maton sulleg on or accsg iie.0 Fane's. Halooas Corpus Petitions ___-S._ Ae a_classes ond 4 distinc’ typescloitizens ™ Sb. _Daliheratly constuse. POISTRSAL TGS OS TELON ‘sity 0 us20 to cule agaiasiy Mr Crane's. Halreas Corpus Pehitieny 12. faint authority dogs WAS CouRT OF APPEALS FoR THE NENTH BO CIR6ULT howe ‘nat allows tt +0 “krowlaghy” ond Natentionally” wse _12. Arona procedures statutes codes cose laut "slock:a. MeMlante| sah Ws Ub wa YO (2000) and Gonzale? os Moaler, S65 ws Wa HO-H\ (D013) ond ag us.c.8 18. 2083 (C) 2) to supercede. or over rule tine Suerene Compt’s decision ——1h_tale vs Henle. 201 0.543.000) ulti Katee cose laud Hogt ME Crane _KL_used_le bis Robes Corous Petition: Ground 2-084, scons te mele defend th tis Hats pratectes log AML. WSC Amend nents FL __2.0 bs sia auticarity does Ana MS. OOURT.OF A REALS FoR THE NAN _ai_cigloks protecktd log te wS.CAcAisombnent 2 se . at. Pog ® Bore sions | Presented 3 ee oa Bip ult quilnarity doce Moe STATE/ COURT Wave ‘oat alles tebe 83. STATE to violate Mr Lrantis dus process ond nigtsts protected Vay deta ook tusited to thee Followinin wS.CA Amendments AHS )8 ot... By ullnat outlaority does ae Couch |STATEA Wnate to Focee en 2b, fy__ssdnct putes does tee STATEA ond tae th. 69 MET OF ky No SPER ALS noe, Loat_alleas te compaie ly \Qner & Dive MNEEOR Mn 1 COMMER ETAL CONE = WC. N BOS Oh UC ClO Wren i occepted Hoe usec tne code ta toeicfits pager wore, contracts. and peg agreement? ; a 1s, Ta connection wit Pe Common Lou andlor ws.C.A Section, — te, paragraphs 2. and AS. v Anderson 6 F.Supe wT (ae weshl). a ttt tne secant atta — Ah save_ toot gives hie pawer te suspend Mn Cranes pentslagafeidak , as, ty what outlnarity dors Soe Usk, OFSTRICT Suet oF APPEALS 21. ondlor ony. coos. MAARIET_COMRTS. nove. tino ollows it to swperceed, wna not octnawsledge..or fallow Federal Rules -EUN3). Procedure Rule a (oy (y= ——ai.tacegecds ts ony of all sf tne gohots awting rites, constitutional an. claims political ond \ stots claims facds ons arguements toised asin Mr Crane's bak e2as Corpus Petition, .estriions cappaals ang Cm de Yoigrackions with Mar US dtSTeteT courTAT _ ; OH. aut not o STATUTORY “citizen” “born ‘a ond Domicile s MW tyre ___05._shates of tins Union) outside of federal Territory andor beside g Ol, Congtecs a Be a bn a 4a, : 20, : 25, : ! ; 28 Page Dd Qusestionls Presented EEE —— .