No. 19-8812
Alfonso Pineda-Hernandez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-question constitutional-rights court-interpretation criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process fair-trial interpretation translation translation-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under what circumstances does a live, in-court translation violate a criminal defendant's due process rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is an important and recurring one that has not been, but should be, addressed by this Court: Under what circumstances does a live, in-court translation violate a criminal defendant’s due process rights?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Alfonso Pineda-Hernandez
Kyle Russell Hosmer — Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent