Sharon Johnson v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
DueProcess HealthPrivacy
Whether in pro per parties are entitled to the same U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights as represented parties, and how can they uphold those rights without having legal knowledge, a 7 law degree, or counsel
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether in pro per parties are entitled to the same U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights as represented parties, and how can they uphold those rights without having legal knowledge, a 7 law degree, or counsel. 2. What constitutes judicial bias, and is disqualification the correct remedy. 3. Does a disability require reasonable accommodation by a judge, such as petitioner's Asperger’s autism and her attempt to speak in court to assert her rights, and does denial of accommodation violate her U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights. 4. Are federal HIPAA protections or California’s Marsy’s Law, or states’ ‘ restraining order laws applicable to related cases in order to protect the same party, for example from retaliation. 5. Can states apply their small claims statutes unequally and does that deny plaintiffs their U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights.