Whether the Alabama courts have violated the constitutional rights of a defendant by denying effective counsel, allowing the prosecution to define the meaning of a statute, and permitting the state to decide what evidence the jury can consider

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED De He Courts in Alaberrd beve. @ apt deap Arete Ss fins tifotional Kishts fo & Lee ond prapathial feel and Egvet Piolectrort oF Be law 7] Dees Oesrtor fave. CG. Corr irhe tone | Nght fer eSectve Covnse! when Pas under Cothtact , but nsbeady fhe. fow ye goes ike & Coltvator. wi. fhe Dk fo deny Newlen @ féve and Jor Pat te t trial ? Does He Aleberia Cools frove fe Zo lew fhe Plem bgvage. of fhe Shhele. of the be and Jeafeletores patent, ot Can fhey mobe vp We oun versio 7? Lees 4 presecotes fave. te avtpority feaud fhe Suty iin be B2freai ne He Meani2as Of a _Sfstobe of Ais Ui, Ins bexte) of whet 9 Stakbie. peally means and fe else jnstioct the. Juv as be whet sloty Mey esi believe? Es tf pot Capshifotronal JE feagset fees 0 ly anise thle. evidente fo he gfecided by ately, or does phe Stete ond fhe Ceor? decide phet evidence Shey part phe Jory de heet 7 3 te Mlabema Curls Bo pPewes fell Hct Ag Leet aver ide We Cansd ferhorioal faws, acd Ye (aw Set own by phe United ShebeS Supreme Carts? ts p+ Conshbobrenally pes miss! bhe. hor He Cootts bo uphold | Jew f2E8 piliee or governprent Condvet+ 7 .