Should courts be held responsible for abuse of discretion when failing to follow the rule of law as written?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED SHOULDENT A COURT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS ABUSE OF DESCRETION WHEN IT FAILS TO FOLLOW THE RULE OF LAW AS IT IS WRITTEN??? SHOULDENT A RULE OF LAW BE INTERPRETED as WRITTEN, BY ALL COURTS IN THE NATION? SHOULDENT THE LANGUAGE OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL. PROCEEDURES 41(g) BE PROPERLY APPLICABLE TO "ANY PERSONS AGGREIVED" AS IT IS WRITTEN, 2. eo 4 RATHER THAN ONLY TO PERSONS PROCEEDING IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AS BOTH LOWER COURTS HAS HELD TO DENY PETITIONER THE RETURN OF HER VEHICLE??? SHOULDENT A PETITIONER PROCEEDING IN PRO PER BE GIVEN THE BENEFIT OF ALL DOUBT ALONG WITH TO BE EXCUSED FROM ALL TECHNICAL PROCEEDURAL MATTERS? : ‘ In addressing these questions petitioner invites this honorable court to view the vule itself "Federal rules Of Criminal proceedures Rule 41(g)" if conjunction with arguements presented by petitioner in the lower court followed by that court's opinion attached hereto this petition within