No. 19-8830
Justin Michael Oxendine v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review circuit-court criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-discretion legal-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines upward-variance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion by varying upward
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court abused its discretion by varying upward when an applicable guideline provision addressed conduct that formed part of the rationale for the variance.
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Justin Michael Oxendine
Stephen Clayton Gordon — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Stephen Clayton Gordon — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent