Was Petitioner Denied a Fair Trial, or was Petitioner's Trial a Result of Structural Errors of Due Process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED /, Was Petiti0ner Diving a Farr Tria, or was . peadioners trial a fot! Structucal Evros if ‘Dge process Pew. ot fetal Depot vation''o F COONSEL edt Fyig) 9 . again e the cult seit Liled in US. Oisteict Coo woe 4 oO ; Oo oh < pe ) a. Civil Action fuo. js Olde (cd oOness tvéet Date, 2, Was presiding Tih bias aut Pf etudice against feditioner at 4riq/ AeCause FeLit ioner Ltlec ae Ja fuk bn presial i Ag Judge for Violating Tudic(a| Conoluct. oe fu kes before hotiMhioners tial Aylo? The comphind anor Filed in Marck 2olk before fedition e/S Tiel (yp Pek, Qol¥. B. Was +he Jory Fereman ed fetip#ioners finial or AN of the Surors a part of (4,f4.0.D Thats Molpers Again gtOrvak Privins which raght be biased and Presid lee 294 (a5€Petitioner? ly. was petitioners UiS.L, Ver amendment “due process) violated ‘n Pleviees 3 gvestions? PetHiones Trial ezvase| wa S bass i nfs at his “aia briencl Fhe Hh ar str jets Geutt Legetice dunins fetiiones's thial josteads BE fAI'3 attention. tothe DAS, and what phey were talking a batt.