No. 19-8839

Clayton D. Morrow v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-06-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-material brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel missouri-v-frye newly-discovered-evidence plea-bargaining plea-offer public-records-request
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a public records request meet the criteria to establish a newly discovered evidence claim as Brady v. Maryland does; especially when the information found is that of a favorable plea offer with an attached deadline that was never relayed by counsel to defendant, as announced in Missouri v. Frye?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented | Does a public records request meet the criteria to establish a newly | | discovered evidence claim as Brady v. Maryland!, does; especially when the information found is that of a favorable plea offer with an attached deadline that was never relayed by counsel to defendant, as announced in Missouri v. Frye?? 1 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 2 Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134, 182 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012). i 1. : Il.

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)

Attorneys

Clayton D. Morrow
Clayton D. Morrow — Petitioner
Clayton D. Morrow — Petitioner
Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent