No. 19-8841

Gregory Moore v. Orange County, California, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-07-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourth-amendment government-liability rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the United States Supreme Court overturn a state case where serious United States Constitutional human rights have been violated by government social service agents using federal taxpayers' money?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Should the United States Supreme Court overturn a state case where serious United States Constitutional human rights have been violated by government social service agents using federal taxpayers’ money? More specifically, the following enumerated list of due process and equal rights violations represents some of the most egregious governmental abuses. I. Institutional evasion of protecting the fundamental constitutional human rights of the Moore family. Il. The arbitrary and non-uniform application of legal authorities, including the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, raises the issue of Fifth Amendment United States Constitution due process rights. Ill. The federal Adoption of Safe Families Act (ASFA) of 1997 funds the government oppression and exploitation of children without proof of a warrant in violation of the 4» amendment of the United States Constitution. IV. Government code 820.21 requires a "malice" standard for government agent liability. The people are not protected by this standard which raises the issue of equal protection. Supreme Court Petition for Review ii Moore v. OCSSA

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-15
Waiver of right of respondent Orange County, California to respond filed.
2020-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Gregory Moore
Gregory Moore — Petitioner
Gregory Moore — Petitioner
Orange County, California
Roberta A. KrausWoodruff, Spardlin & Smart, APC, Respondent
Roberta A. KrausWoodruff, Spardlin & Smart, APC, Respondent