No. 19-8842
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-provisions constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction search-and-seizure sentencing-standards speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
The ticket was Printed 9:56 the WArNiNg An sva CCourt Distriet The Middle recorded stop 9:58AM. Was MHX agree Lindsay D Trooper IN for ISoue the Moment that the officer (k-9) is in theat Use Wrwin ticket d print out, why is the a iscreewy? Detitioner's Convictiol is teGal and
2) We Ther Constitutionally 4 ValiD WHERE: a) PetitiONeR'S SPEEDy TRial RicHts ViOLAtED 1s e Grken is wot included in the
3 Why Wasut Trooper Staterent and testimony the Suppress herring as the Vides Show
4) IN THE video evidence he have. , show the Monent that I stop Lindsay the Search, Trooper reques ting. igvore My
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Angel Prado
Angel Prado — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent