No. 19-8847
Michael D. Nixon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-USC-3006A constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process expert-witness funding-denial geo-location indigent-defendant sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Michael D. Nixon's constitutional rights were violated when the District Court failed to grant him, an indigent defendant, funding for a geo-location cellular phone expert witness pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Michael D. Nixon's constitutional rights were violated when the District Court failed to grant him, an indigent defendant, funding for a geo-location cellular phone expert witness pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e).
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael D. Nixon
Kevin Michael Cafferkey — Kevin M. Cafferkey Esq., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent