No. 19-886
Israel K. Negash, et al. v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-procedure administrative-process civil-procedure discovery-rights due-process government-data judicial-review regulatory-enforcement snap-benefits standing statistical-analysis summary-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should SNAP retailers accused of trafficking be permitted to conduct discovery on judicial review under 7 U.S.C. §2023 prior to summary judgment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented to this Court is: Should SNAP retailers accused of trafficking, especially through the use of circumstantial statistical analysis, be permitted to conduct discovery on judicial review under 7 U.S.C. §2023 prior to the issuance of summary judgment where: the retailer’s 56(d) declaration seeks discovery including undisclosed and untested information and data upon which the Government based its disqualification?
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Israel K. Negash, et al.
Andrew Zachary Tapp — Metropolitan Law Group, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent