No. 19-8861
Fikri Aptiliasimov v. Pennsylvania
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias judicial-impartiality judicial-recusal recusal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court judge's, a former prosecutor of appellant's prior criminal trial, refusal to recuse himself and his subsequent judicial participation violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT JUDGE"S, A FORMER PROSECUTOR OF APPELLANT'S PRIOR CRIMINAL TRIAL, REFUSAL TO RECUSE HIMSELF AND HIS SUBSEQUENT JUDICIAL PARTICIPATION VIOLATED THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURS : , TEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED AN EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL...?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Fikri Aptiliasimov
Fikri Aptiliasimov — Petitioner