No. 19-8876
Solomon Jalloh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: apprendi apprendi-rule common-law common-law-tradition criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing jury-findings loss-calculation restitution sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether under Apprendi, the maximum restitution that can be imposed without additional jury findings as to any amount of loss is zero, consistent with the common law tradition?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether under Apprendi, the maximum restitution that can be imposed without additional jury findings as to any amount ofloss is zero, consistent with the common law tradition?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Solomon Jalloh
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent