No. 19-8878

Frank Richardson v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c criminal-law first-step-act retroactivity sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018 applies to defendants whose convictions and sentences remain pending on direct review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L On December 21, 2018, President Trump signed into law the First Step Act of 2018 which dramatically changes the penalties imposed for gun-related crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). At issue herein is whether Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018, which is expressly titled a “clarification” of the penalty provisions of § 924(c), should apply to defendants, like the instant Petitioner Frank Richardson, who was sentenced before the enactment of the First Step Act of 2018 but whose convictions and sentences remain pending on direct review and, therefore, are not yet final. i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Frank Richardson
Michael R. DezsiLaw Office of Michael R. Dezsi, PLLC, Petitioner
Michael R. DezsiLaw Office of Michael R. Dezsi, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent