Did the Indiana appellate court overstep its authority in supporting counsel depriving a direct appeal as of right, without following Anders or equal state procedure as required by the 14th Amendment due process clause?

Question Presented After appellate counsel opted to utilize a Davis-Hatton procedure, but failed to reinstate the direct appeal, did the Indiana appellate court overstep its authority in supporting counsel depriving a direct appeal as of right, without following Anders or equal state procedure as required by the 14"" Amendment due process clause, when, the state provides no Anders withdraw, but mandates that all appeals as of right be fully briefed? hae i