Maria Pena-Rivera v. United States
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Is it error by the district court to fail to enumerate the specific basis for allowing evidence pursuant for Federal Rule of Evidence section 404(b) such that it can properly be analyzed pursuant to the required review under Federal Rule of Evidence 403
QUESTION PRESENTED | Is it error by the district court to fail to enumerate the specific basis for allowing evidence pursuant for Federal Rule of Evidence section 404(b) such that it can properly be analyzed pursuant to the required review under Federal Rule of | Evidence 403. | | ; | SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES | OCTOBER TERM, 2020 | No : / MARIA PENA-RIVERA, PETITIONER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, / RESPONDENT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO | THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ! FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT | The petitioner, MARIA PENA-RIVERA, respectfully prays that a | writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment of the United States Court of | Appeals for the Ninth Circuit entered after refusing a petition for rehearing and | ; petition for rehearing en banc on June 15, 2020 OPINION BELOW On May 7, 2020, the Court of Appeals rejected petitioner’s arguments in the above-entitled case which is not published. On June 15, 2020 the panel | rejected a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (See