No. 19-8890

Richard Antonio Hodge, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-sentencing first-step-act resentencing retroactivity rule-of-lenity sentence-enhancement sentencing-provisions statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the ameliorative sentencing provisions of the First Step Act apply to defendants who were initially sentenced pre-First Step Act, but whose sentences have been reversed and remanded for resentencing post-First Step Act?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED On December 21, 2018, the First Step Act of 2018 was enacted. The Act clarified that “second or subsequent” convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924(¢)\—which carry enhanced, stacked sentences—apply only after a prior conviction has become final. Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 403. Section 403 of the First Step Act applies “if a sentence for the offense has not been imposed as of such date of enactment.” Id. at 403(b). The question presented is: Whether the ameliorative sentencing provisions of the First Step Act apply to defendants who were initially sentenced pre-First Step Act, but whose sentences have been reversed and remanded for resentencing post-First Step Act?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Richard Antonio Hodge
Matthew A. CampbellFederal Public Defender, District of the Virgin Islands, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent