No. 19-8899
Michael Wayne Blanche v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(3)(a) aiding-and-abetting armed-bank-robbery crime-of-violence federal-criminal-law jury-finding jury-instructions sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether aiding and abetting armed bank robbery is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether aiding and abetting armed bank robbery isa crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). 2. Whether the verdict and 7-year sentence on the § 924(c) charge in Count Two cannot stand without a jury finding either (1) that the armed bank robbery and/or aiding and abetting charge in Count One is a crime of violence; or (2) that petitioner “brandished” a firearm. i
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-04
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 4, 2020.
2020-07-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2020 to September 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Wayne Blanche
John Paul Balazs — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent