No. 19-8900
Jeffrey Chleo Brown v. United States
Tags: appellate-preservation circuit-split criminal-procedure district-court-procedure factual-dispute factual-objection legal-sufficiency preservation-of-appeal procedural-error sentencing sentencing-objection standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a factual objection at sentencing sufficient to preserve for appeal the district court's failure to resolve the ensuing dispute?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L Is a factual objection at sentencing sufficient to preserve for appeal the district court’s failure to resolve the ensuing dispute? i
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-08-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 25, 2020.
2020-08-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 4, 2020 to September 25, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 4, 2020.
2020-07-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2020 to September 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Chleo Brown
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent