No. 19-8902
Rafael Antonio Patino-Villalobos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acknowledgement criminal-procedure defense-counsel district-court federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure invited-error legal-doctrine procedural-waiver rule-52(b) sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether defense counsel's acknowledgement of the district court's statement during sentencing constitutes an affirmative, intentional, deliberate, and/or unambiguous agreement under the invited error doctrine?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L. Whether defense counsel’s acknowledgement of the district court’s statement during sentencing constitutes an affirmative, intentional, deliberate, and/or unambiguous agreement under the invited error doctrine? 1
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Rafael Antonio Patino-Villalobos
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent