No. 19-8906
Nathan Matthew Kinard v. Michael Hoffman, et al.
IFP
Tags: abuse civil-rights commitment-procedures constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custody due-process habeas-corpus individual-liberty mental-health
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Dera's testimony and emails should be considered, and whether others were tortured into pleading while in Escombra County jail's protective custody, when the court was aware of the abuse but did not investigate the mental health concerns
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (Dera. toe witness Ftotements andemails considered 2 How Many others Were tortured into -foline a plea While in EScombra County daclF protective Custady? Sakety ONY MONtal healt Was Never (vestigated, fhougin the Courtreom Ujas made aware of the abuse, Why 2
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Nathan Kinard
Nathan Matthew Kinard — Petitioner