No. 19-8907
Jonathan Boyer v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-uscs-2254 civil-procedure federal-courts federal-habeas habeas-corpus judicial-procedure motion-to-recall relitigation-bar statutory-interpretation successive-petition
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether and under what circumstances a motion to recall judgment attacking the erroneous application of the relitigation bar in 28 USCS 2254(d) should be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether and under what circumstances a motion to recall judgment attacking the erroneous application of the relitigation bar in 28 USCS 2254(d) should be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition? i LIST OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2020-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Darrel Vannoy
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Jonathan Boyer
Richard John Bourke — Louisiana Capital Assistance Center, Petitioner
Richard John Bourke — Louisiana Capital Assistance Center, Petitioner