Did the prosecution's intentional and repeated abuse of the witnesses and the selective theft of the petitioner's exculpatory legal materials, concealing material investigative instructions and discussions of the petitioner's sole corroborating witness, render his trial constitutionally unfair?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : T 2 Did + Le. prosecutions intentions { and cepeate A_use, & vare lable ultmesses and the sheci€Es theft of the feditionec's cuteping leqal moat, cenfeuni.s material investigative instructians and discussvons of total Strates x pertaining to the examination of +he Petitione ris Sole. Coccoboradi ng wetness , render his trial conctitstton cay uot ie 2 TE. Did connsel's filure to present evidence of Petitioner's million dollar T-Phone case dectribution deal deprive hier of Hne effective assistancea? counsel? mr. | id Counsed's Sil rete tavestiaacke cehuttal evidence Re the Manlic(ler” charged oiith, deprive. PeArhionee of efkecdive assrsrante. of counsel 2 \