No. 19-8912
Giezi Arce-Calderon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process guideline-range guideline-sentence judicial-discretion plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentence imposed on Mr. Arce is substantively unreasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED A. Whether the sentence imposed on Mr. Arce is substantively unreasonable, despite being a guideline sentence of six months, where the parties agreed to a lower end of the guideline sentence of zero months. ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Giezi Arce-Calderon
Thomas J. Trebilcock-Horan — Trebilcock LLC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent