Whether defendants' convictions under 18 U.S.C. 924(c) should be vacated

Questions Presented a cee) Ldhather prose. dePandanls sine file under AB US.0. 82255 ond ore a pail babs coms hy th Cat Jae aif Jn be tk onus ce a oy tt an pacoission of the applicable Couch of Appals? a Tea ae ym apg et te pl ny Ble sas sn sl A SE.$ 0085 ae Hac sach iudsmanl as dicected by she rule, OF 18 the ower cour concect , | |-I0 Fe chacacterining the motien on the second, sepambe. sudymnant asa _setond Lor succes mati and cali be geukeagte? | cee (3) Lohether ara aoyuttal io feel hdd te rebucn. ones presumplin of oe —-Innecence as to the specific oct of offense Should also be held to demonstrate en cchual _innecance’ of that specific ach or ofilense for the pucpses of AEOMI inca bn a Tf abla in Wats 6 pra dln Sony anal legions aah ee yt pata alin as ggpiconin ah gl se. . ~— Fame spats aye sto ation sha Syonchih oa has nace || deorabs. se Bre Brom the framers intentos.te alec the ineyahy of tha a ere ———H| Pramsstats od sonomot the use of this Coals cutter to rsasioct the a ‘praesent Saute lye inn bi Ye || aoa nat he ple ond tha eagle Cou ay ansucg Sh |} felt to_tmocance ond finedom is masinbined inthe hubote of suse? Nc ee en ne ce Talale ot Contents | Opin ions Below an cot Surisdiction tt Constitutional and. Stators Provisions Tnoslved ,Authortes Cited 0D ae ve dt Stabe mant_of the Case a Reasons for Granting Hae Wee a Sa > vent] Conclusion inten To Appendices 0 a Appandix A= TMandats. Bin Cireuh C0. A_in AR UYEBMe cece ey 00 ao SEO) nec